Expert Case: Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.

This was a patent and trade secret case concerning lidar (laser radar) technology for self-driving cars and trucks.  It was the biggest case I've worked on, with potential damages over $2 billion, and also one of the most fun.  I was the defence's expert on the patent side, and we beat Google--they dropped all their patent assertions.  (This was made a lot easier by the fact that Uber wasn't infringing, of course.)  The trade secret side of the case settled dramatically at the end of the first week of the trial during the cross-examination of Waymo's technical lead.  The settlement was for 0.34% of Uber's stock, which is currently valued at about $250M, i.e. about 10% of the damages being sought.  No cash changed hands.  No wrongdoing was admitted, and to my eye, there wasn't any; but that 10% lets everybody get back to work and avoids the jury possibly doing something random.

Waymo is a former business unit of Google, and now a sister company.  They were alleging that Anthony Levandowski, former head of their self-driving car effort (Google's Project Chauffeur) stole over 14,000 files containing their trade secrets when he founded his own companies Ottomotto and Otto Trucking, and brought them with him when he sold Ottomotto to Uber.  That's the part that had the tech world chewing popcorn and watching for the last year or so. 

I did a bit of work on the trade secret side, primarily in looking for prior art to show that at least some of the alleged secrets were well known in the art, but my main contribution was on the patent side, where I was able to demonstrate by simulation, detailed examination, and operational testing that the accused Uber system (code named Fuji) did not infringe the asserted claims, and by way of deposition and expert reports was able to refute Waymo's expert, who vigorously contended otherwise but had no adequate body of evidence.  Waymo recognized that they were going to lose the patent side at trial, and so dropped all their patent contentions in mid-September 2017.  It's great when the legal process gets the right answer.

Dates: July-September 2017