<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sensitive Design on ElectroOptical Innovations</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/categories/sensitive-design/</link><description>Recent content in Sensitive Design on ElectroOptical Innovations</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 21:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://electrooptical.net/categories/sensitive-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>"Super-Regenerative Receivers" by J. R. Whitehead</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/super-regenerative-receivers-by-j-r-whitehead-modern-radio-techniques-series-cambridge-1950/</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 23:39:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/super-regenerative-receivers-by-j-r-whitehead-modern-radio-techniques-series-cambridge-1950/</guid><description>&lt;figure&gt;&lt;img src="https://electrooptical.net/media/uploads/whiteheadcover.jpg"
			alt="&amp;amp;quot;Super-Regenerative Receivers&amp;amp;quot; by J. R. Whitehead"&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quick plug for a little gem of a book that all fans of early radio should know about: &amp;ldquo;&lt;a href="https://electrooptical.net/www/WhiteheadSuper-RegenerativeReceivers.pdf"&gt;Super-Regenerative Receivers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rdquo; by J. R. Whitehead (Cambridge University Press, 1950).  It&amp;rsquo;s part of the Modern Radio Techniques series, where a bunch of the technical movers and shakers document the advances that were made during the war, &lt;em&gt;e.g.&lt;/em&gt; centimeter radar.  This one is about the theory and practice of superregenerative radios.  I learned a lot from it and had a lot of fun.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Silicon Photomultiplier Module Design</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/silicon-photomultiplier-module-design/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:30:28 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/silicon-photomultiplier-module-design/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Internal Developments&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the last year or two we&amp;rsquo;ve been doing a lot of work aimed at replacing photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) in instruments, using &lt;em&gt;avalanche photodiodes&lt;/em&gt; (APDs) and &lt;em&gt;silicon photomultipliers&lt;/em&gt; (SiPMs).  These devices are arrays of single-photon detectors, so they&amp;rsquo;re also known as &lt;em&gt;multi-pixel photon counters&lt;/em&gt; (MPPCs).  Our main application areas include biomedical instruments such as flow cytometers and microplate readers, which have to measure low light levels very precisely but don&amp;rsquo;t need the ultralow dark current of PMTs. (Follow-on articles will talk about our SiPM work in airborne lidar and SEM cathodoluminescence, as well as on improving the performance of actual PMTs.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Signal to Noise Ratio and You, Part 2</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/signal-to-noise-ratio-and-you-part-2/</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:05:47 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/signal-to-noise-ratio-and-you-part-2/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href="https://electrooptical.net/blog/digital-lock-in-principles/"&gt;Part 1&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed ways to get better measurements by improving the &lt;em&gt;signal to noise ratio&lt;/em&gt; (SNR), and saw that although it was often a win to measure more slowly and use lowpass filters, going too far actually makes things worse, because of the way noise concentrates at low frequency.  Here we introduce a more sophisticated approach that generally works better: the &lt;em&gt;lock-in amplifier.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We were considering a typical &lt;em&gt;baseband&lt;/em&gt; signal, one that goes from near DC to some much higher frequency.  Audio is a typical example, with a bandwidth usually quoted as 20 Hz to 20 kHz.  To escape the low frequency noise, we need to move our signal up in frequency, out of baseband.  In lock-in detection we make the signal periodic in time at some &lt;em&gt;carrier&lt;/em&gt; frequency &lt;em&gt;fc&lt;/em&gt; chosen to be several times higher than the required bandwidth. This is generally pretty easy to do, as we&amp;rsquo;ll see, and doing so ensures that none of the signal we care about remains near DC.  Our noise rejection filter now needs to be a narrow bandpass centered at &lt;em&gt;fc&lt;/em&gt;,  so as to reject both low-and high-frequency noise.  We&amp;rsquo;ll also need some means of measuring the amplitude and phase of the AC signal.  That&amp;rsquo;s more complicated, of course, but with this setup we can narrow the bandwidth as much as we like and still get the full SNR improvement.  A lock-in amplifier is a device for making such narrow-band AC measurements conveniently.  It&amp;rsquo;s basically a radio that measures the phase and amplitude of its input, so that we recover a lowpass-filtered version of the baseband modulation signal that we care about, with no 1/&lt;em&gt;f&lt;/em&gt; noise pollution to worry about.   At this point we need to geek out a little bit and talk about &lt;em&gt;modulation&lt;/em&gt;, which is what we mean by moving the signal away from baseband.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Technology: Low Noise Thermoelectric Cooler (TEC) Controllers</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/technology-low-noise-thermoelectric-cooler-tec-controllers/</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/technology-low-noise-thermoelectric-cooler-tec-controllers/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="thermoelectric-peltier-coolers"&gt;Thermoelectric (Peltier) Coolers&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A thermoelectric cooler is a solid-state device made from two alumina ceramic plates with an array of metallized pillars in between.  The pillars are also ceramic&amp;ndash;they&amp;rsquo;re made of alternating &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;-type and &lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt;-type bismuth telluride (Bi2Te) semiconductors, alloyed with antimony telluride (&lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt;-type) or bismuth selenide (&lt;em&gt;n&lt;/em&gt;-type), and connected in series electrically.  The Peltier effect makes them electric-powered solid state heat pumps.   (Thermocouples work the other way round, via the Seebeck effect, but the physics is the same.)&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>BEOS outtakes: Photographic Film</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/photographic-film/</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/photographic-film/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From the cutting room floor at &lt;em&gt;Building Electro-Optical Systems, Third Edition&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Photographic Film&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
 Okay, okay.  Photographic film isn&amp;rsquo;t a detector of the sort we&amp;rsquo;ve been discussing.  Film is so out of fashion, so inconvenient.  It needs messy chemicals.  Getting it to be highly sensitive requires all sorts of 1960s alchemy such as pre-flashing and hypersensitizing in a forming gas or hot hydrogen atmosphere.  Why do we care about it at all, in these days of 4k x 4k CMOS imagers?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Thermal Runaway Found Useful</title><link>https://electrooptical.net/blog/thermal-runaway-found-useful/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:51:39 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://electrooptical.net/blog/thermal-runaway-found-useful/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://electrooptical.net/www/sed/TemperatureBalancer.png"&gt;This odd circuit&lt;/a&gt; is an &lt;em&gt;on-chip temperature balancer&lt;/em&gt; that uses thermal runaway to force N transistor arrays to all run at the same temperature.  BJT dissipation goes up at low temperature, with very high gain.  Here&amp;rsquo;s its &lt;a href="https://electrooptical.net/www/sed/TemperatureBalancerSteppResp100usPerDIv.tif"&gt;step response.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>