Projects
February 24, 2021
— updated June 20, 2025
Specifications
| |
|---|
| 3dB Bandwidth | From DC–200 kHz to DC–300 MHz |
| Rise Time | 4ns (highest bandwidth configuration) |
| Gain Control Method | Gain settable by serial or analog voltage. Analog voltage control profile mimics behaviour of similar PMT modules. |
| Detector Type | Hammamatsu S13361/S13362 series or On Semi MicroFC series SiPm |
| Coupling | DC |
| Output Impedance | 50 Ω |
| Dynamic Range | All configurations support analog and photon counting |
| Power Requirements | +5V 100mA, -5V 10mA |
| Signal Output | SMA |
| Applications | Flow cytometry, Microplate readers, TOF Lidar |
In the last year or two we’ve been doing a lot of work aimed at replacing photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) in instruments, using avalanche photodiodes (APDs) and silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). These devices are arrays of single-photon detectors, so they’re also known as multi-pixel photon counters (MPPCs). Our main application areas include biomedical instruments such as flow cytometers and microplate readers, which have to measure low light levels very precisely but don’t need the ultralow dark current of PMTs. (Follow-on articles will talk about our SiPM work in airborne lidar and SEM cathodoluminescence, as well as on improving the performance of actual PMTs.)
January 30, 2020
In How We Work, we gave an overview of how we build instruments, from the initial feasibility calculation (or photon budget) to delivery of the first production units.
Each project is different, of course, but there are common themes. Here’s a description of these steps from our most recent one at this writing (late January 2020), which is a low-cost cathodoluminescence detection system for use in scanning electron microscopes (SEMs).
Photon Budget
Cathodoluminescence Principles
A SEM works by scanning a tightly-focused beam of high-energy electrons (1 keV - 30 keV) across a sample, and looking at the stuff that comes out. For ordinary imaging you usually look at backscattered and secondary electrons, but there are other modes. For instance, you can get a lot of information about the sample’s chemical composition by looking at the x-rays it emits. Most samples will also emit some amount of light, a process called cathodoluminescence .
January 27, 2020
— updated September 7, 2021
At EOI, we’ve been building advanced instruments very successfully for a long time. One reason for our success is our large inventory of working designs, and another is the way we go about doing it. This post walks through a typical sort of development plan for a challenging customer requirement. Here are the usual steps, in the form of a hypothetical email proposal outline for a fibre-coupled noninvasive glucose sensor similar to this one.
(You can also read about a recent project that went a lot like this, except with a single prototype stage.)
December 10, 2019
— updated March 9, 2025
A low-resolution thermal camera with competitive sensitivity (0.13 K NETD) at very low cost. Easily built from scratch—it requires no special parts, except a screen-printed sheet of pyroelectric PVDF polymer (as used in automatic porch lights) and a moulded polyethylene Fresnel lens. This camera achieves a cost reduction of 2 orders of magnitude ($10 vs $1000) over the next cheapest, which is a 256-pixel PZT array from Irisys, while maintaining very good sensitivity. These are from a project called Footprints.
The design is simple: screen-printed carbon ink on a free-standing film of PVDF polymer, with a multiplexer made out of ordinary display LEDs with a few interesting optical and electronic hacks, as shown in these photos.
December 10, 2019
Optical phase is a wonderful thing—it can get you good topographical images of samples with no discernible amplitude contrast, for example, or allow you to disambiguate phase features from amplitude ones. My interest in phase-sensitive microscopes dates back to my graduate work—hence this paper. It gives design details and the theory of the heterodyne scanning laser microscope, including the point- and line-spread functions, plus a deconvolution method that can give resolution equivalent to an ordinary microscope working at λ0/2—ultraviolet resolution from a visible-light scope. Operating with a green Ar+2 laser (514.5 nm) and 0.9 NA, it attained a 10%-90% edge resolution of 90 nm.
This works because the interferometer makes it a confocal microscope, i.e. its amplitude point-spread function is the square of the illumination PSF. By the convolution theorem of Fourier transforms, that means that its bandwidth is twice as wide, i.e. ±2NA/λ. A bit of digital filtering turns the resulting nearly-triangular transfer function into something a bit more Gaussian-looking, which gives us a factor of 2 resolution improvement. Unlike the usual image processing ad-hockery, Fourier filtering makes absolutely no additional assumptions about the sample; the additional information comes from measuring both phase and amplitude, which is why you need an interferometer.
December 10, 2019
Particles in plasma etch chambers are a major source of yield loss in semiconductor manufacturing. Particles condensing from the plasma or spalling out of films on the chamber walls are levitated in the edges of the plasma sheath for long periods, and then (too often) drop on the wafer when the plasma excitation is turned off.
Process control and tool utilization can both be improved by knowing what’s happening inside the chamber while the process is going on—but how? The plasmas are usually too bright to look at, and there’s only one (poor quality) window in the typical chamber, so an optical particle detector would have to work in backscatter, with a huge background.
ISICL is capable of seeing and mapping individual particles of less than 0.2 μm diameter, as they float around in the plasma, a unique capability.
December 10, 2019
— updated February 3, 2020
Laser noise is very often the primary limiting factor in making high-accuracy optical intensity measurements. There are ways of making your laser quieter, but they won’t get to the shot noise level. On the other hand, what we actually measure is the photocurrent, not the laser power, and that we can improve.
Laser Noise Cancellers are extremely powerful devices that allow us to make shot-noise limited measurements at baseband, even with very noisy lasers. With zero adjustments, they will reliably suppress the effects of laser residual intensity noise (RIN) by 55 or 60 dB from dc to several megahertz, and with a bit of (optical) tweaking, will do 70 dB or more at low frequency, which is where it’s most needed (see the picture above, which shows > 70 dB suppression of noise intermodulation). There’s a New Focus app note which surveys applications of noise cancellers.
The laser noise canceller has two operating modes, linear and log-ratio. The linear mode produces a replica of the photocurrent minus the noise. The log ratio mode also suppresses the intermodulation of the laser noise with the signal, allowing (for example) tunable diode laser spectroscopy to achieve 1-ppm sensitivities even when the laser power is varying by >30% over a scan line, as shown here.
December 10, 2019
— updated December 9, 2022
There are a variety of EM simulation schemes in wide use, with different strengths and weaknesses. For free-space antennas at radio frequency, where dielectrics are simple and metals are excellent conductors, integral equation schemes such as the method of moments (MoM) win. At optical frequencies, particularly when metal is involved, partial differential equation methods are generally better. The two most common PDE schemes are finite element method (FEM) and finite difference, time domain (FDTD). The antenna-coupled tunnel junction work required simulations with very fine resolution (1 nm) in some places, to represent plasmons and metal surface discontinuities, and a very large simulation domain, at least 5 μm square by 20 μm long. This requires multiprocessor capability and subgridding, i.e. different places in the simulation domain having different cell sizes. Subgridding is a natural strength of FE, but presents a challenge in FDTD, which naturally likes uniform cubical grids. On the other hand, mesh generation can be very time consuming, and FEM doesn’t clusterize as well as FDTD and is much harder to get correct.
December 10, 2019
— updated December 9, 2022
My silicon photonics work at IBM centred on the idea of integrating submicron silicon optical waveguides with metal plasmonic antennas and metal-insulator-metal (MIM) tunnel junctions, to build optical detectors and modulators in the 1.55 μm region.
